Incidents and records · Workers, foremen and company administrators

When records differ: original entry, dispute and correction

When work hours or safety acknowledgments are disputed, keep the initial statement distinct from the objection. Allowing a correction is different from preserving an auditable history.

Original conceptual diagram; not a live app screen or statutory form.
Original conceptual diagram; not a live app screen or statutory form.

Illustrative site situation

Illustrative situation: the worker recalls one full workday, but a foreman's draft shows half a day. Preserve both statements, supporting information and the time and reason for review.

Original hypothetical example, not an actual incident.

01Before work

  1. 1Identify the date, site and worker for each entry.
  2. 2Find out who recorded the original value and on what basis.
  3. 3Separate competing statements without silently deleting the original.

02During work

  1. 1Review the reason and evidence for the challenge.
  2. 2Distinguish acceptance, counterproposal and rejection, recording reasons.
  3. 3Keep the previous value, revised outcome and decision time.

03Records and follow-up

  1. 1Original entry and what it represented
  2. 2Worker objection and supporting records
  3. 3Reviewer decision and its reasoning
  4. 4Open, resolved or deferred status and later changes

Official laws and guidance

Primary documents are in Korean. Confirm current legal applicability and detailed requirements at source.